Another example of molehills into mountains, danged if you do and danged if you don’t, sensationalized “media,” clickbait, and as I might say “impatience will find one wallowing in hogwash or being pelted by nutria nuts.”
FOX News Headline: “Cop in uniform tossed from college classroom by ‘uncomfortable’ teacher”
The Blaze Headline: “Care to Guess Why a Cop Who’s Also a College Student Was Escorted From Class? (Hint: He Was in Full Uniform)”
Breitbart Headline: “Uniformed Officer ‘Escorted’ From Classroom: Teacher ‘Uncomfortable’ With Gun”
IJReview Headline: “College Student Gets Kicked Out of Class After Professor Sees His Gun. There’s Just One Problem…”
Freedom Daily Conservative News Headline: “Georgia: Leftist Teacher tosses Police officer out of his college classroom — for being in full uniform”
It’s obvious that these “media” outlets relied upon the information supplied by local news affiliate WALB TV.
WALB TV Headline: “Police officer escorted out of Darton College classroom”
NOTE: I once worked at this institution.
As for the local TV news I appeared on WALB dozens of times either being interviewed or providing comments about various stories or events. It’s both the ABC and NBC television affiliate for the area. The dual affiliation from my limited knowledge seems common in smaller markets. They operate with limited resources. For example while being interviewed in my office for the news telecast, the reporter often operated the camera instead of having a separate camera person. The other major affiliate, WFXL, for the area had similar procedures.
Obviously the WALB or WFXL coverage and reporting in my personal opinion is not at the level of say a WBRZ or WAFB in BR, WWL or WDSU in NOLA, and especially WRC, WUSA, or WJLA here in the DC region, but it is comparable to similar small markets. Many reporters are just starting out in the profession and like all careers some improve and advance while others leave for other professions. Some of your more experienced reporters and anchors have ties to the area and have chosen to remain for that reason. It’s not because they lack in quality.
Back to this “fully armed officer and liberal professor” WALB updated their original story:
The local newspaper, the Albany Herald, reported this update:
Now if you are an employee, patron, or merely a passerby and see something suspicious are you trained to or encouraged to ignore it?
At one of the GOP debates, the issue of people failing to report activity because they feared our supposed “PC” environment became a topic of discussion.
On the other side of the aisle individuals calling 911 to report seeing people walking with long guns became the targets of harassment and threats by open carry proponents in Texas.
How can you distinguish between a “good guy with a gun” and a “bad guy with a gun?” Does the same formula apply to a “woman with a gun?”
Here it appears that the student in question was not dressed in the “typical” police uniform. I have no personal experience, but I would think that one could purchase a “typical” police uniform for legal activities such as a Halloween costume so even the uniform isn’t always a 100 percent identifier.
As for polo shirts, I’ve never been in law enforcement but at various times in my life I have owned shirts given to me for belonging to local sheriff’s organizations which had insignia. Honestly I have no idea if the insignia differed from those same shirts given to members who were actual law enforcement personnel from the insignia on the shirts given to civilian supporters such as me. I can only say that I never pretended nor was I ever mistaken for being a law enforcement officer when someone happened to see me wearing the shirt or ball cap.
My point is that we are all sliding in the direction of believing what we want to believe and discrediting challenges. Regardless of what we might think, an echo chamber rests at our fingertips thanks to technology. We also have an industry profiting from emotions, gullibility, and in some cases the lack of time to ask for or to demand proof.
Will any of the national or partisan media outlets who ran with the story have updated headlines with updates about how the story is less exciting?
If by some chance akin to those of winning Powerball they do will those who caste quick conclusive judgements care?
We still do not know if the student presented campus security, which by the way did not exist when I worked for the institution as city and county law enforcement served in that capacity, with identification proving that he or she was a law enforcement officer.
If anyone misinterpreted existing law in any manner, in this specific situation that failure did not cause anyone harm. If anything the additional minutes spent reviewing the events will reinforce the applicable laws.
Yes I expect to hear the “what if,” “this is a start,” and all these other dire predictions of both present and future. My response is that when common sense and rudimentary precautions are deemed “evil,” “oppressive,” or “politically motivated” then we are less of a society.
If you really think about it, it doesn’t matter how fancy, how nice the cover, how pretty it’s packaged because BS is still BS, hogwash, pig puddles, cow cookies, nutria nuts, and so on are still the same. We can wallow in it; we can choose to take the high road over the top or path around. We can find some soap to help clear away any muck. The choice is ours.